Saturday, 23 August 2014
Soaring prices–business hawks are on a loot:
Sunday, 13 April 2014
Goodwill matters:
- DZire 42,481
- Swift 47,237
- Ertiga 13,593
Wednesday, 8 May 2013
Exploiting black money:
Tuesday, 13 May 2008
Zookoda email newsletters, a bloggers boon
Tuesday, 6 May 2008
Monitoring free time and expense

Sunday, 30 March 2008
Recycled plastic utilities
Wednesday, 5 March 2008
A fool proof Insurance Cover
Friday, 29 February 2008
Facilitating commercial mortgages
Rebuilding bad credits
Compensations are not a favour but a right
Thursday, 28 February 2008
On telemarketing service
Wednesday, 27 February 2008
Claims for compensation
Tuesday, 26 February 2008
Cosy comforts of a Bed
Training matters for any discipline of career
Debts are not necessarily a burden
Saturday, 23 February 2008
Model garages
Thursday, 21 February 2008
Bankruptcy is a serious menace
Loans with a personalised touch
Tuesday, 19 February 2008
Underhand tricks to grab money
There are many a systems adopted by different businessmen to earn money or say grab money from the people. Most common feature these days is to use share trading as a tool for the purpose particularly with reference to Initial Public Offer (IPO). Alluring advertisements attract the investors who consider it a better strategy to invest at the initial stage in IPO which is supposed to be moderately priced at the outset. IPOs may succeed after they are listed in the regular share market and they may flop too like it happened only recently in the case of Reliance Power much highlighted as a Powerful Reliance Power which in reality was nearly a miserable flop. Another was the one floated by EMAR which too failed getting practically no response from the investor as a result of which it had to be withdrawn. In both the cases there is no refund given to the investers. Reliance Power extended partial allotments as against the applications for a bigger number of shares. There is nothing much wrong in it as it all emerges through business constraints but how come they didn't refund the balance amount of investors as yet. EMAR did neither return the total money deposited by investors nor they thought it feasible to make necessary statement on that count. In both the cases, like there might be several others too, they are holding the huge amount of money deposited by investors earning millions of rupees as interest thereon out of which not a single naya paisa is allowed to go to those who gave them this amount. If there is any thing like business ethics, there can be no justification at all in withholding public's money like this to earning multiple benefits out of it. This is highly unjustified, this is blatantly unfair.
Monday, 18 February 2008
Many a faces of exploitation
Not confined to some solitary area or the other, exploitation has many a faces differing from level to level. Exploiter number one is the government itself who does it uniformly on all counts. Be it collection of land revenue, be it levies or be it taxes, every where it surpasses all. Top men in business or the business magnates of middle level have their own system of realising their pound of flesh in typical ways. One such system is to launch an IPO, make huge collections,extend the last date of closing in which process it takes quite a time. Applicants for the shares are not always allotted the number of shares they ask for while applying. If it is a highly rated company, it receives a bumper response from the investers. Here again it takes a long time in sorting and finalising the applications. On finalisation, the company has the choice of accepting, rejecting or partially accepting the request. Some one applies for 225 shares like it was done in the case of Reliance Power, the applicant is proportionately allotted, say 16 shares as against 225. After allotting the shares, the balance amount to be refunded to the depositor is not remitted back to him for a long time. By the time it is done, the gap grows to several weeks during which period the entire amount so collected in millions/billions of rupees remains with the company on
which they earn returns in several ways without any slightest possible portion of it going to investors. Delays are often intentional obviously for the reasons to earn an extra monetary edge. Companies dealing in Mutual Funds do the same thing. Accepting applications with immediate deposit by investors putting and keeping it in their accounts and delay the finalisation. I opted for a Mutual Fund investment with small amount and even after enough of gap I have not received in the necessary acknowledgement. Certain IPOs collapse at the outset itself but the investors have to wait for refund of their deposit for several months if at all they are lucky enough to get back the investment amount without resorting to litigations. It is possible to understand direct levies and taxes but difficult to make out any reasoning for hidden earning on disclosed profit transactions.